Dec 11, 2022·edited Dec 11, 2022Liked by Austrian China
with the constant chant of "DON'T LOOK THERE" the western population is similarly oblivious to various facts, remedies, and side effects to the vaccine - see Celine Dion for example. i have heard that many chinese will still hold on to the fear of the virus - because once the government tells you something it is very difficult to walk it back - look at what happened when they told chinese that everyone should own a car - to help the auto industry - then 5 years later the traffic had turned roads into parking lots.
I have a question: "What if the people were getting sick because they have been under the very tremendous pressure that you have described and that the daily life, in which they were use to find more or less homéostasie has been ruined?" Thus, their immune system is more or less impaired.
I like your perspective but could not agree with ivermectin and hydroquinone are effective to COVID 19. Neither drug is recommended by WHO. I thought that is a big claim that they can save lives. So I took a look at your references. The website c19early.org has a few concerns IMO. It is a pooled study meaning you are aggregating studies that could have dramatically different conditions together. The hydroxy chloroquine's "effectiveness" they claimed all include zero effect in the confidence interval, basically they cannot rule out the possibility that HCQ is ineffective. The ivermectin page has an even interesting results. All early treatment studies referenced in the study individually show their effectiveness's confident intervals cover zero effect yet the pool study showed a strong positive results. Apparently they are weighting each study by patients number which is a loaded assumption.
with the constant chant of "DON'T LOOK THERE" the western population is similarly oblivious to various facts, remedies, and side effects to the vaccine - see Celine Dion for example. i have heard that many chinese will still hold on to the fear of the virus - because once the government tells you something it is very difficult to walk it back - look at what happened when they told chinese that everyone should own a car - to help the auto industry - then 5 years later the traffic had turned roads into parking lots.
Thanks.
I have a question: "What if the people were getting sick because they have been under the very tremendous pressure that you have described and that the daily life, in which they were use to find more or less homéostasie has been ruined?" Thus, their immune system is more or less impaired.
I like your perspective but could not agree with ivermectin and hydroquinone are effective to COVID 19. Neither drug is recommended by WHO. I thought that is a big claim that they can save lives. So I took a look at your references. The website c19early.org has a few concerns IMO. It is a pooled study meaning you are aggregating studies that could have dramatically different conditions together. The hydroxy chloroquine's "effectiveness" they claimed all include zero effect in the confidence interval, basically they cannot rule out the possibility that HCQ is ineffective. The ivermectin page has an even interesting results. All early treatment studies referenced in the study individually show their effectiveness's confident intervals cover zero effect yet the pool study showed a strong positive results. Apparently they are weighting each study by patients number which is a loaded assumption.